• Nuffield Hospital Leeds

    2 Leighton street, Leeds, LS1 3EB
    Main switchboard: 0113 388 2000
    Out-patient bookings: 0113 388 2067

    View on map

    BMI The Duchy Hospital Harrogate

    Queens Road, Harrogate, HG2 OHF
    Main switchboard: 01423 567136
    Out-patient bookings: 0808 101 0337

    View on map

    Spire Methley Park Hospital

    Methley Lane, Methley, Leeds, LS26 9HG
    Main switchboard: 01977 518518
    Out-patient bookings: 01977 518518

    View on map
  • Jan 7

    Robot-assisted knee replacement costs

    If we are to charge patients thousands of pounds more for robot assisted knee replacements, surely we need to establish their value first, argues Prof. Nick London.

    Surgeon Being Assisted by Robotic Arm During Surgery
    *Image shown for illustrative purposes only.

    Like any private surgery, a knee replacement is a significant investment for a patient. Without insurance, they’ll pay around £11,500 for a partial knee replacement in the UK and £12,100 for a total knee replacement.

        >  What are partial (PKR) or total knee replacements (TKR)?

    In the US, costs are considerably higher. With outpatient charges, a total knee replacement costs on average $50,000.

    And then there’s the cost of the robot. At a going rate of around £1 million per unit, health facilities have significant outlay to recoup, which is why in the UK (and following an entirely unscientific ring round of service providers) you can expect to pay between £750 and £3,500 more when you add a robot into the knee replacement mix. In the US, and consistent with the upper end of our own findings, a robot increases costs by around 26%.

    Now that’s a lot more money. If I was going to ask a patient to pay that, I’d assume they would expect me to justify it. At present, I couldn’t do that. So how are others able to do it?

    Weak evidence

    In the past 18 months, two papers have been published in the Bone & Joint Journal, one on robot assisted total knee arthroplasty, the other on uni-compartmental (partial) knee replacement.

    Neither study was randomised and the sample size was relatively small, and both identified the following results:

    • Reduced postoperative pain
    • Decreased opiate analgesia requirements
    • Shorter time to straight leg raise
    • Decreased number of physiotherapy sessions
    • Mean time to discharge reduced from 71.1 hours to 42.5 hours (in the case of partial replacement) and 105 hours to 77 hours (in the case of total)

    It is difficult to read either set of results with a straight face. As you might gather, I don’t use a robot to assist my knee replacements, yet 90% of my partial replacements go home next day. As we’ve reported in these pages previously, some units in the country are promoting a same day service. In that context, announcing you’ve cut the length of stay from three days to two in 2019 is a little like announcing you’ve invented the wheel.

    There’s also something decidedly short term about the other results. If I’m paying a premium of several thousand pounds, is it too much to ask that the benefits might outlast my stay in hospital?

    No difference between robotic and conventional knee replacement

    Earlier this year, a study was published by YH Kim and others entitled Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? In short, the conclusion of this randomised, controlled trial was no, it doesn’t.

    Damningly, the report’s authors said: “At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, we found no differences between robotic-assisted TKA and conventional TKA in terms of functional outcome scores, aseptic loosening, overall survivorship, and complications. Considering the additional time and expense associated with robotic-assisted TKA, we cannot recommend its widespread use.”

    It’s worth adding that the study found no negative difference in complications or outcomes at 10 years either, but that hardly amounts to enthusiastic justification for the additional expense.

    The role of the robot

    Yorkshire Knee Clinic has clearly explained its position regarding robots in the past and it bears repeating: we believe robot-assisted knee surgery (partial or total) has great potential as a research tool but its benefits and risks are not at all clearly defined. The assumption that it must be better because it uses technology is entirely incorrect and misleading to the public, not least because it creates risks of its own including the increased length of time in surgery and more or longer incisions.

    One of the oft-reported advantages of robots is that they improve alignment. This has real potential for long-term benefit, but the technology needs to be studied in a safe and controlled way so that we can fully understand the potential benefits and risks. That’s particularly the case when the tech is so extremely expensive for the health provider and the individual (and often misled) patient.

    The above report throws the onus back onto the knee surgeons performing robotic surgery. It’s now down to them to produce the evidence to support their claims that robots improve patient outcomes and implant longevity.

    Because as long as the demonstrated benefits are short term and questionably relevant, patients and insurers are left paying a lot extra for very, very little.

    To explore treatment options for your knee pain, please get in touch.

        >  Discover more about Prof. Nick London
        >  Discover more about partial or total knee replacement surgery

    • Posted by  | 
    • (0) Comments
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Most popular